Duplichecker vs Quilbot – The Paraphrasing Comparison

Don't READ this alone. Smiles!!! Kindly share to others.

Writers are creative and possess the talent to craft high-quality written content for different purposes based on their niche. You should also know that working as a writer attracts its fair share of obstacles that requires you to solve. One is the obstacle of grammatical errors, which we have discussed by comparing two different proofreading software you can consider. The Grammarly vs Hemingway post will help you solve your indecision about selecting proofreading software for your writing. Now let us distinguish and check the Duplichecker vs Quilbot matchup to know the best platform for paraphrasing.

The Importance of Considering Duplichecker vs Quilbot for Paraphrasing

Paraphrasing holds equal importance as proofreading when it comes to improving the quality of your writing for various reasons. The primary reason is that the content you are writing already exists somewhere on the internet for people to access. Therefore, your content might be a copy of those, mainly based on similar topics. Other times, it might be among your sources for research and will affect the uniqueness of your writing after upload. The solution you have to resolve this issue is to paraphrase effectively, and here is where these tools work best. The Duplichecker vs Quilbot comparison will help you discover what these two paraphrasing platforms offer when improving content. You will also understand the better choice between the two and the reason for that conclusion.

Duplichecker Paraphrasing Tool

Duplichecker vs Quilbot

Duplichecker is a web-based paraphrasing tool that uses artificial intelligence to assist you by offering paraphrasing services for writing. It doesn’t provide paraphrasing features alone but gives you access to many other features depending on your plan’s objective. The Duplichecker brand works to improve your content by giving you text-based solutions with different inbuilt features. The paraphrasing text editor has a free word limit of 2000 per entry, allowing you to type or paste copied content. You will need to pay a monthly subscription fee to increase your word limit, which varies on different packages. It also allows you to upload a pre-created document to the editor since you might prefer that to type. Lesser word count takes less time to paraphrase, and you have to complete a captcha entry before it works.

Pros

  1. It takes less time to paraphrase written content with low word counts on the web-based platform
  2. The paraphrasing tool lets you do a grammar check in the text editor after rewriting the content you input.
  3. Duplichecker highlights all the swapped words to notify you of the changes made and gives other suggestions by clicking them.
  4. It gives you the option of running another paraphrasing scan immediately if the initial result doesn’t meet your standards.
  5. Depending on the context, you can also refuse a word suggestion and replace it with a word of your choice.
  6. It offers a free package that you can use for paraphrasing, and the paid packages are also affordable

Cons

  1. You must complete a captcha entry every time you input content to paraphrase, and it will not work otherwise.
  2. The free package does not accept word counts that exceed the 2000-word limit and will cut off excess words.
  3. All your document uploads will fail if the content word count exceeds your respective package’s word limit.
  4. The paraphrasing features only work for English, and contents are written in related dialects alone, leaving other language writers stranded.
  5. The grammar check isn’t as good as many other free services that its competitors offer, making it less choice.

Quilbot Paraphrasing Tool

Duplichecker vs Quilbot

The Quilbot Software is another paraphrasing tool that holds relatively high popularity among many writers and their communities based on results. It also offers similar services as Duplichecker, such as grammar and plagiarism checks, paraphrasing, and other features. Some of the features that Quilbot offers, unlike Duplichecker, are a summarizer and citation generator. Quilbot also has a text editor where you can type in your content but doesn’t have formatting tools for writing. You can also try a sample test, paste copied content, or upload the document that you want to paraphrase. The tool gives you different paraphrasing modes depending on the theme and the direction you want your writing to go.

Pros

  1. It offers both standard and fluent paraphrasing modes on the free package, suitable for newbie writers.
  2. Plugins and extensions are available for standard software such as Google Chrome, Google Docs, and Microsoft Office Word.
  3. You can upload a pre-created document for paraphrasing if you prefer not to type or copy directly from your source.
  4. The premium plan is affordable, and you can choose between monthly, semiannual, and annual payment plans depending on your choice.
  • It allows you to increase the change frequency of words when switching them with synonyms during the paraphrasing process.
  • You can also perform a grammar check on the Quilbot paraphrasing web platform, which helps you get better quality.

Cons

  1. The free package only gives you a paraphrasing word limit of 125 words which is too little for large content.
  2. Quilbot paraphrasing tool only works with content written in English or any related dialect leaving out other important languages.
  3. The web platforms and extensions will not offer premium service except if you have a running subscription with Quilbot.
  4. Only the premium version offers fast paraphrasing speed and enhanced grammar word rewriting for contents.
  5. Paraphrasing modes comparison and plagiarism check are only available on the premium plan and require the desktop view to run correctly.

Conclusion

The two paraphrasing tools above have their strengths and weaknesses, which vary depending on the features they offer to you. If you have a large word count and can’t afford premium service, your best choice is Duplichecker. However, you should instead consider Quilbot if you have little word count or can afford the premium charge for it. A general outlook on Quilbot vs Duplichecker is that Quilbot offers better premium features than the Duplichecker tool. However, Duplichecker is better for writers working on larger word counts who can’t afford the premium fee for Quilbot.


Don't READ this alone. Smiles!!! Kindly share to others.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Welcome to Ascent - Please, take your time to explore and learn online skills. For the BEST SITE EXPERIENCE, RIGHT CLICK LINKS to OPEN IN NEW TAB.
Welcome to Ascent - Please, take your time to explore and learn online skills.